Beyond Technicals: The Missing Piece to Profitable Trading
📉 Tom Hougaard: Why Technical Analysis Won’t Make You Rich
Welcome to Com Lucro! In this eye-opening video, Tom Hougaard dives deep into the biggest misconceptions in trading.
Forget what you’ve been told about technical analysis being the holy grail—because it’s not.
👉 Edwards and McGee? Journalists.
👉 Brokers? Not traders.
👉 The real problem? How you think under pressure.
📌 Hougaard explains why intelligent, successful people still fail in trading: they never learned to think like traders.
This isn’t about strategy—it’s about mindset.
✅ Learn what REALLY separates the 10% winners from the 90% who lose
🧠 Understand the psychology behind fear, failure, and decision-making
🚫 Stop relying only on charts and indicators—fix your thinking first!
👉 Watch more insights and trading wisdom at ComLucro:
🌐 Com Lucro – https://www.comlucro.com.br/
📺 YouTube – Com Lucro – https://comlucro.com.br/youtube
📈 TradingView – https://www.tradingview.com/?aff_id=119375
#TomHougaard #TradingMindset #TechnicalAnalysis #TradingPsychology #TraderTruths #WhyTradersFail #CFDTrading #ComLucro #TradeSmart #ThinkLikeATrader
00:00:00,800 --> 00:00:04,080
See this book here? It’s called the
“Bible of Technical Analysis”—not
00:00:04,080 --> 00:00:08,960
the King James Bible for Christians,
but the bible for technical analysis,
00:00:08,960 --> 00:00:16,080
as written by Edwards and Magee. Were Edwards
and Magee traders, ladies and gentlemen? Were
00:00:16,080 --> 00:00:24,640
Edwards and Magee traders? No, they were
not traders. They were journalists. More
00:00:24,640 --> 00:00:33,680
than a million copies of this book have been
sold... Normal leads to broke, and the brokers.
00:00:33,680 --> 00:00:38,480
They’re well-meaning. They want you to do well.
Why does a broker want you to do well? Well, hell,
00:00:38,480 --> 00:00:41,040
the better you do, the more you’re going
to trade, the more you’re going to trade,
00:00:41,040 --> 00:00:46,000
the more commission you’re going to place. It’s
the logic, of course, the brokers want you to
00:00:46,000 --> 00:00:52,320
do well, CMC included. I’m not knocking CMC,
but CMC are not traders, IG are not traders.
00:00:52,320 --> 00:00:55,280
Citi Index index is not trading, King
Capital is not traders. They are not
00:00:55,280 --> 00:01:00,640
the ones where you should be getting
your guidance from. Sure, by all means,
00:01:00,640 --> 00:01:06,640
learn about technical analysis, but technical
analysis has never made anyone anything. You’re
00:01:06,640 --> 00:01:12,640
not going to get rich from trading by
learning technical analysis. In short,
00:01:12,640 --> 00:01:17,040
your problem is not that you don’t
know enough about technical analysis.
00:01:17,040 --> 00:01:23,360
Will you trust me on this, that you don’t
need any more technical analysis? You need
00:01:23,360 --> 00:01:32,480
a serious review of how you think when you’re
trading. So let’s try with that. My argument is
00:01:32,480 --> 00:01:39,760
that if 80-90% of people are losing when they’re
trading CFDs, this is not a broker problem. This
00:01:39,760 --> 00:01:46,800
is a human problem. And particularly, I think I
mentioned it before, I believe that those 80-90%
00:01:46,800 --> 00:01:54,800
are perfectly rational people—intelligent,
good-looking, smiling, good mums, good dads.
00:01:54,800 --> 00:01:58,400
Good Students, good at everything—that are
just rubbish traders because they haven’t
00:01:58,400 --> 00:02:01,680
learned to think properly. They
haven’t learned to deal with fear.
Perguntas Respondidas por esse Artigo
-
Qual é a principal crítica de Tom Hougaard à análise técnica no trading?
-
Por que pessoas inteligentes e bem-sucedidas frequentemente falham no trading, segundo Tom Hougaard?
-
O que separa os 10% de traders bem-sucedidos dos 90% que perdem dinheiro?
-
Qual é o foco principal para melhorar o desempenho no trading, de acordo com o vídeo?