Are You Trading Like the 90% Who Lose? Tom Hougaard Explains
📊 Are Fibonacci Retracements Really That Reliable?
Tom Hougaard questions a common trading belief: the effectiveness of Fibonacci retracements. While many traders rely on levels like 61.8%, 78.6%, and even 94.5%, he argues that betting against the prevailing trend at those levels may not be the best idea.
🔥 Key Takeaways:
✔ Why blindly trusting Fibonacci levels can be dangerous
✔ The issue with using the same indicators as the majority
✔ Why most traders (75-90%) lose money
✔ A new perspective on trading decision-making
Are you making the same mistakes as the majority? Watch now and rethink your strategy!
🔔 Subscribe to ComLucro!
📺 https://comlucro.com.br/youtube
🌐 Explore More Trading Insights:
➡️ ComLucro – https://www.comlucro.com.br/
📊 TradingView – https://www.tradingview.com/?aff_id=119375
#TomHougaard #TradingMistakes #FibonacciTrading #Forex #MarketPsychology #TechnicalAnalysis #DayTrading #StockMarket #TrendFollowing
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:05,200
when a market makes a 61% retracement
00:00:03,080 --> 00:00:07,680
some would argue that this is the ideal
00:00:05,200 --> 00:00:09,559
time to either buy or sell short
00:00:07,680 --> 00:00:12,120
depending on the direction and uh if
00:00:09,559 --> 00:00:14,240
that fails then there's also the 78.6%
00:00:12,120 --> 00:00:16,359
retracement and hell why not throw the
00:00:14,240 --> 00:00:19,320
88.6 and
00:00:16,359 --> 00:00:21,800
94.5% ratio so there's always a ratio
00:00:19,320 --> 00:00:23,320
for the particular season however my
00:00:21,800 --> 00:00:27,439
argument is that if the market has
00:00:23,320 --> 00:00:30,679
already traded up to a 78% retracement
00:00:27,439 --> 00:00:32,960
surely if you sell short at 78 you're
00:00:30,679 --> 00:00:35,360
actually betting against the prevailing
00:00:32,960 --> 00:00:37,079
Trend some would argue against me I'm
00:00:35,360 --> 00:00:39,280
not really so interested in what other
00:00:37,079 --> 00:00:41,120
people are thinking I am more interested
00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:43,920
in trying to explain to you that the
00:00:41,120 --> 00:00:47,079
majority of indicators are available to
00:00:43,920 --> 00:00:50,840
the majority of people yet considering
00:00:47,079 --> 00:00:53,800
that 75 to 80% maybe 90% of all people
00:00:50,840 --> 00:00:56,800
engaged in trading are losing maybe it's
00:00:53,800 --> 00:00:58,680
a time we have a real long hard look at
00:00:56,800 --> 00:01:01,840
what it is that we're actually doing
00:00:58,680 --> 00:01:01,840
when we are trading
Perguntas Respondidas por esse Artigo
-
Qual é o principal questionamento de Tom Hougaard sobre negociação?
-
Quais níveis de Fibonacci são comumente usados por traders?
-
Qual o risco de confiar cegamente nos níveis de Fibonacci, segundo Tom Hougaard?
-
Qual a porcentagem de traders que perdem dinheiro, segundo o post?
-
Qual é o problema de usar os mesmos indicadores que a maioria dos traders?