Momentum vs Value Investing Which Strategy Wins in the Long Run SM

📊 “If momentum stops working… should I be patient, or has the trade degraded?”
Joel Greenblatt lays out one of the most powerful investing lessons of all: stick to what you understand, even when it’s out of favor.

In this episode from ComLucro, we share a sharp clip from Greenblatt’s talk on the difference between momentum and value investing, and what it really takes to stay disciplined when your strategy isn’t performing.

🎯 Learn:
Why Greenblatt avoids crowded trades
The danger of chasing what’s popular
How to evaluate long-term edge vs. short-term results
The mindset behind value investing that survives cycles

📈 Want to build a strategy that lasts? Stick to principles — not trends.

🌐 Com Lucro – https://www.comlucro.com.br/
📺 YouTube – Com Lucro – https://comlucro.com.br/youtube

#JoelGreenblatt #InvestingStrategy #ValueInvesting #MomentumTrading #PatiencePays #LongTermThinking #TradingPsychology #ComLucro #SmartMoney #CrowdedTrades


Legenda:

00:00:00,320 --> 00:00:05,680
If we were, for instance, momentum 
investors, okay? And I will tell you that,  

00:00:05,680 --> 00:00:09,920
for those of you who know what that 
means, momentum has been studied  

00:00:09,920 --> 00:00:14,560
across the globe over the last 30 or 40 
years. In the US, it’s worked pretty much  

00:00:14,560 --> 00:00:20,320
everywhere — not all the time, but on average, 
it’s worked very well over 30, 40 years.

00:00:20,320 --> 00:00:25,520
And not just in this country. 
But here’s the problem:  

00:00:25,520 --> 00:00:28,800
what if it didn’t work over the next 2 or 3 years?  

00:00:29,600 --> 00:00:35,920
It could be that we just have to be patient. You 
know, it works over time, and it’s cyclical. And  

00:00:35,920 --> 00:00:41,040
so it’s out of favor, and we just have to stick 
to our guns because it’s something that’s worked.

00:00:41,040 --> 00:00:45,120
Or it could be, if it didn’t work in the 
next 2 or 3 years, that the explanation is:  

00:00:45,120 --> 00:00:47,920
hey, it’s not so hard to figure out. A 
stock used to be down here and now it’s  

00:00:47,920 --> 00:00:51,600
up here. It’s got good momentum, and 
with all the data and the ability to  

00:00:51,600 --> 00:00:56,160
crunch numbers and computers and studies 
that have come out, it’s a crowded trade.

00:00:56,160 --> 00:01:02,560
It’s degraded — it’s not as good as it used 
to be. And if that’s what happened over the  

00:01:02,560 --> 00:01:06,000
next 2 or 3 years, I wouldn’t know the answer to 
that question. I didn’t know which one it was:  

00:01:06,000 --> 00:01:10,400
should I just be patient, or has the 
trade degraded? But if you view stocks  

00:01:10,400 --> 00:01:14,000
as ownership shares of businesses that 
you value and try to buy at a discount,  

00:01:14,000 --> 00:01:17,120
and that doesn’t work for a couple of years, 
I’m not going to change what I’m doing.

00:01:17,120 --> 00:01:20,560
I’m not going to buy the bottom 
right-hand corner — you know,  

00:01:20,560 --> 00:01:24,400
buy all the money losers in the companies 
that don’t earn anything or are trading at  

00:01:24,400 --> 00:01:28,560
100 times free cash flow. I’m not going to buy 
those, even if it works in one particular year,  

00:01:28,560 --> 00:01:34,560
and then sell the ones that are cheap relative to 
everything, get me high rents and everything else.

00:01:34,560 --> 00:01:41,760
I’m not going to change my strategy. And I believe 
that stocks will eventually — not right now, but  

00:01:41,760 --> 00:01:46,077
eventually — people get it right. And I may have 
to be patient. That’s really what I have to do.


Perguntas Respondidas por esse Artigo