Top 3 Tips to Find the BEST Investment Manager.
📊 Choosing the IDEAL Fund Manager: Beyond Past Returns! 🕵️♂️
Welcome to Com Lucro channel! In this essential video, we dive deep into the strategies for selecting an effective fund manager, going beyond the superficial analysis of past returns. Discover why focusing solely on previous results can be a mistake, and learn how to identify a solid investment process and a well-founded investment thesis. Understand the importance of a manager’s variant hypothesis and the challenges they face, including time horizons and market volatility. We also touch on the surprising findings of a Morningstar study regarding their star system and what it truly indicates for investors.
👉 Key Points:
Understanding the Shorter Time Horizons in Today’s Market
Why Simply Looking at Past Returns Can Be Misleading
The Importance of a Sound Investment Process
Identifying a Manager’s Variant Hypothesis
The Challenges Faced by Active Fund Managers
Interpreting Studies on Fund Performance (Like Morningstar’s Star System)
Focusing on Patience and Long-Term Value Recognition
🔔 Subscribe to stay updated with our latest episodes and elevate your investment game!
https://www.google.com/search?q=https://comlucro.com.br/youtube
🛠 Recommended Tool:
TradingView – https://www.google.com/search?q=https://www.tradingview.com/%3Faff_id%3D119375
🌐 Com Lucro – https://www.comlucro.com.br/
#FundManagerSelection #InvestmentStrategy #ActiveManagement #ValueInvesting #MarketAnalysis #InvestorPsychology #FinancialMarkets #InvestmentProcess #Morningstar #ComLucro
00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:05,359
frankly time horizons are getting
00:00:02,320 --> 00:00:06,879
shorter used to be when I was uh younger
00:00:05,359 --> 00:00:07,919
you used to get quarterly statements and
00:00:06,879 --> 00:00:09,280
most people would throw them in the
00:00:07,919 --> 00:00:11,280
garbage now you can check your stock
00:00:09,280 --> 00:00:13,519
price 30 times a minute on the internet
00:00:11,280 --> 00:00:15,839
maybe some of you do and we're just
00:00:13,519 --> 00:00:17,920
playing time arbitrage we're being uh
00:00:15,839 --> 00:00:19,279
patient buying cheap good businesses and
00:00:17,920 --> 00:00:21,840
waiting for the market to recognize the
00:00:19,279 --> 00:00:24,240
value we see but it takes some work to
00:00:21,840 --> 00:00:26,160
value companies and let's say you don't
00:00:24,240 --> 00:00:28,320
want to do that so one thing you could
00:00:26,160 --> 00:00:30,560
do is try to find someone good to do it
00:00:28,320 --> 00:00:32,640
for you right the um showing you there's
00:00:30,560 --> 00:00:34,719
this opportunity maybe someone can do it
00:00:32,640 --> 00:00:36,880
for you and what you should probably
00:00:34,719 --> 00:00:39,440
look for when you're looking for that
00:00:36,880 --> 00:00:42,079
person is someone who has a good
00:00:39,440 --> 00:00:44,000
investment process the problem is uh for
00:00:42,079 --> 00:00:45,760
most active managers if you think of
00:00:44,000 --> 00:00:48,399
their challenge when they're picking an
00:00:45,760 --> 00:00:51,280
individual stock they must think that
00:00:48,399 --> 00:00:53,039
they have a variant uh hypothesis as to
00:00:51,280 --> 00:00:54,960
why that stock is priced differently
00:00:53,039 --> 00:00:57,120
than the way it should be and I can tell
00:00:54,960 --> 00:01:00,480
you I've been doing this over 35 years
00:00:57,120 --> 00:01:02,559
and it's very rare almost never have I
00:01:00,480 --> 00:01:07,119
bottom ticked a stock bought bought it
00:01:02,559 --> 00:01:10,400
at the absolute bottom so 99.9 plus% of
00:01:07,119 --> 00:01:12,000
the time a stock is down after I've
00:01:10,400 --> 00:01:14,560
bought it and there really only two
00:01:12,000 --> 00:01:16,400
reasons why one is I was wrong the other
00:01:14,560 --> 00:01:20,560
is I just need more time for my thesis
00:01:16,400 --> 00:01:23,439
to play out now as an outside allocator
00:01:20,560 --> 00:01:26,000
you don't really know what the thesis
00:01:23,439 --> 00:01:29,600
for the individual stock was even the
00:01:26,000 --> 00:01:31,520
manager himself sometimes doesn't know
00:01:29,600 --> 00:01:33,119
when things are going against you there
00:01:31,520 --> 00:01:35,439
are all kinds of agency problems you
00:01:33,119 --> 00:01:37,520
know you got people to answer to you
00:01:35,439 --> 00:01:39,759
have behavioral issues just naturally
00:01:37,520 --> 00:01:42,640
you start to doubt yourself it's very
00:01:39,759 --> 00:01:44,799
unclear sometimes even to them what
00:01:42,640 --> 00:01:46,240
their biases are and what they're doing
00:01:44,799 --> 00:01:48,240
so the allocator doesn't really
00:01:46,240 --> 00:01:51,040
understand the thesis behind each pick
00:01:48,240 --> 00:01:52,799
it's not clear that the manager uh is
00:01:51,040 --> 00:01:55,360
totally unbiased when he has a variant
00:01:52,799 --> 00:01:57,119
thesis that's going against him and so
00:01:55,360 --> 00:02:00,399
since you don't need know the thesis as
00:01:57,119 --> 00:02:02,079
an allocator most people uh all they
00:02:00,399 --> 00:02:05,759
have are the returns and that's what
00:02:02,079 --> 00:02:08,160
they used so in an interesting study uh
00:02:05,759 --> 00:02:10,000
that came out the day after Thanksgiving
00:02:08,160 --> 00:02:11,360
so it was interesting to me probably not
00:02:10,000 --> 00:02:14,720
interesting to the guys who did the
00:02:11,360 --> 00:02:17,599
study uh Morning Star put out a study of
00:02:14,720 --> 00:02:19,040
their star system and my interpretation
00:02:17,599 --> 00:02:20,720
uh and their star system is based on
00:02:19,040 --> 00:02:22,400
past returns letting you know who's done
00:02:20,720 --> 00:02:24,640
the best over the last 1 three and five
00:02:22,400 --> 00:02:26,080
years of course the study my
00:02:24,640 --> 00:02:27,920
interpretation of their study was that
00:02:26,080 --> 00:02:30,879
our star system doesn't work we can't
00:02:27,920 --> 00:02:30,879
discern
Perguntas Respondidas por esse Artigo
-
Como escolher um gestor de fundos eficaz?
-
Por que focar apenas nos resultados passados pode ser um erro ao escolher um gestor de fundos?
-
Qual a importância de uma hipótese variante do gestor?
-
Quais são os desafios enfrentados pelos gestores de fundos ativos?
-
O que o estudo da Morningstar sobre seu sistema de estrelas realmente indica para os investidores?